The WILLA List of Great Books by Women in 2009
Think Publishers Weekly missed something on their top ten list? Add to The WILLA list Great Books by Women that Publishers Weekly Missed in 2009!
WILLA's Press Release from November 2, 2009
Why Weren’t Any Women Invited To Publishers Weekly’s Weenie Roast?
Publishers Weekly recently announced their Best Books Of 2009 list. In their top ten, chosen by editorial staff, no books written by women were included. Quoted in The Huffington Post, PW confidently admitted that they're “not the most politically correct" choices. This statement comes in a year in which new books appeared by writers such as Lorrie Moore, Margaret Atwood, Alice Munro, Mavis Gallant, Rita Dove, Heather McHugh and Alicia Ostriker.
“The absence made me nearly speechless.” said writer Cate Marvin, cofounder of the newly launched national literary organization WILLA (Women In Letters And Literary Arts), which, since August, has attracted close to 5400 members on their Facebook web page, including many major and emerging women writers. “It continues to surprise me that literary editors are so comfortable with their bias toward male writing, despite the great and obvious contributions that women authors make to our contemporary literary culture.”
WILLA’s other cofounder, Erin Belieu, Director Of The Creative Writing Program at Florida State University, asked, “So is the flipside here that including women authors on the list would just have been an empty, politically correct gesture? When PW’s editors tell us they’re not worried about ‘political correctness,’ that’s code for ‘your concerns as a feminist aren’t legitimate.’ They know they’re being blatantly sexist, but it looks like they feel good about that. I, on the other hand, have heard from a whole lot of people—writers and readers--who don’t feel good about it at all.”
PW also did a Top 100 list and, of the authors included, only 29 were women. The WILLA Advisory Board is in the process of putting together a list titled “Great Books Published By Women In 2009.” This will be posted to the organization’s Facebook page and website. A WILLA Wiki has also been started for people to share their nominations for Great Books By Women in 2009. Press release to follow.
WILLA was founded to bring increased attention to women’s literary accomplishments and to question the American literary establishment’s historical slow-footedness in recognizing and rewarding women writers' achievements. WILLA is about to launch their website and is in the process of planning their first national conference to be held next year.
(Note: until recently, WILLA went under the acronym WILA, with one “L.” If you’re interested in the organization, please Google WILA with one “L” to see background on how this group was originally formed.)


3 Comments:
I guess I'm out of the loop: I never thought of Publisher's Weekly as a good measurement for
literary accomplishment--I think of it as more of a People Magazine type venue, having everything to do with the PR engine, and very little to do with anything else; I guess the point I'm maybe making is this seems like a sort of funny thing to get particularly mad about; if The Boston Review, Conjunctions, The Chicago Review, etc, published a similar list, I'd see a way bigger issue...That said tho, I think I'm likely underestimating the value literary folks place on Publisher's Weekly.
For me, the most glaring literary ellision currently going is how appalingly little major work by/focused on lesbianism there is; unquestionably lesbian major American poets: 4 people! Stein Bishop and Swenson and Rich. In Maxine Kumin's intro to a selected May Swenson, she writes that Lesbian poetry is at the date of her intro almost a cliche; is she serious? That seems so grossly heterosexist to me!
Oh yah: Kay Ryan--who is not textually particularly lesbian (ok yah-yah there's issues of reductionism characterizing her work that way) and is not actually major at-all; E Myles could be on the list too I guess if one is willing to let in folks who aren't clearly long-lasting star talents.
The, lol, Exoskeleton blogger is likely hissing here-here to minorness. I still believe in major bodies of work: it doesn't seem silly to me to write that Milton, or Charlotte Bronte, or Emily Dickinson or Wordsworth are major in a way that most writers are not.
I've left out Audre Lourde, but for me her importance is due to her essays/theorizing, not her poetry. Sister Outsider is
wonderful!
Adam Strauss
Post a Comment
<< Home